The Rise of Circulating Libraries
What were the ‘circulating libraries’ of Austen’s day and what was their role in society?
“I have received a very civil note from Mrs. Martin, requesting my name as a Subscriber to her Library which opens January 14, & my name, or rather Yours, is accordingly given. My mother finds the Money. . . . As an inducement to subscribe, Mrs. Martin tells me that her Collection is not to consist only of Novels, but of every kind of literature, &c. &c. She might have spared this pretension of our family, who
are great Novel-readers and not ashamed of being so; but it was necessary, I suppose, to the self-consequence of half her Subscribers”
(Jane Austen to Cassandra, December 18, 1798)
In this snippet of her letter, to her sister Jane Austen tells us a great deal about not just herself and her family, but of the nature of the library and the novel in society. What was the nature of a Regency era circulating libraries and what was their role in society? It all had to do with literacy rates.
During the Georgian Era literacy rates among the ‘common man’ rose. Consequently, the demand for reading materials increased, driving the rise of two new literary forms, the newspaper and the novel. By 1720, twenty four newspapers were published in Britain. By the 19th century there were fifty four newspapers printed in London alone.
The High Cost of Reading
Unfortunately, the cost of reading material did not decrease with the increase in demand. But, where there’s a will, there’s a way. People banded together to form “newspaper societies” where groups of people, usually those in a local parish, would contribute a weekly sum. With these pooled funds, the society would purchase subscriptions to one or more newspapers. The newspapers would be shared among those in the society.
While they might not be the first to get the news, society members did manage to get their hands on what they might not be able to individually afford. By 1820, around five thousand of these societies were still going strong.
Whether booksellers took note of the idea or came upon it on their own, they realized that, as with newspapers, there were far more readers who wanted books than could actually afford to pay for them. For some perspective, in 1815, the average (three-volume) novel cost a guinea (a pound and a shilling). Based on the current worth of a guinea’s gold content, that was roughly the equivalent of $100 in modern currency.
This doesn’t tell the whole story, though. In the early 1800s, a comfortable middle class salary for a family of four was in the neighborhood of £250. A guinea was slightly more than a pound, but let’s keep the math simple. At the price of a guinea, a typical novel would cost you 1/250 of your yearly income. If you consider the median US income in 2018 as $60,000 (rounding up just a smidge for the sake of the math), then that same novel carries a price tag on the order of $240. Ouch!
All that math kind of puts Darcy’s remark that he “cannot comprehend the neglect of a family library in such days as these” in a different light. But then again, with an income of £10,000 a year, the relative cost would be felt very differently by someone like him. It also makes Reverend Austen’s library of over 500 volumes all the more remarkable when you consider the income of the typical vicar was more a typical middle class wage than even the £2,000 a year that the Bennets of Pride and Prejudice enjoyed.
Enter the Circulating Libraries
Booksellers, particularly those in big cities like London, had already begun making changes in their business practices to reflect these economic realities. By the mid-1700s, they had started encouraging clients to linger at their shops “offering comfortable chairs, a warm fireside in cold weather, some even offering refreshments. The best of these shops soon became places where those with literary interests congregated regularly. Even if a bookseller made enough to afford to employ an assistant or two, most spent a goodly portion of their time in their shops, chatting with their customers. In the days before published book and theater reviews, it was these discussions which enabled people to keep up with the news of the literary world. By the mid-eighteenth century, the social aspects of these literary bookstores were nearly as important as the books they housed.” (Kane, 2011)
From here, it was only a short leap for booksellers to allow their best patrons to take books home with them to continue reading, for a fee of course. Trustworthy patrons were often allowed to rent books to read and return. The idea grew and by 1728, James Leake had established the first circulating library in England. (Hilden) In 1742 Reverend Samuel Fancourt, opened the first circulating library in London. He has also been credited with coining the term circulating library. (Kane, 2011) By the end of the 18th century there were 1,000 circulating libraries across England. (Hilden, 2018)
Libraries Holdings
Early library holdings varied according to the anticipated subscribers of the library. Sometimes existing social clubs or book clubs formed libraries to cater to the interests of their members. These libraries might feature books on science, arts, the classics, law, history, religion or philosophy. Other “club” libraries might feature somewhat broader topics and even some newspapers or magazines which could be made available to members in a separate reading room. These libraries were not open to the public though, available only to members of the club. (Kane, 2011)
Music libraries formed in places like Bath, specifically to allow subscribers access to sheet music. (McLeod, 2017)
Since the circulating library was first and foremost a business, it behooved the library to cater to as many as could afford the price of a subscription. So, most library catalogs reflected a much wider selection of books, appealing to the tastes of both men and women since most libraries could not afford to discriminate on the basis of gender. Savvy proprietors quickly realized that the most profitable sort of book was the fashionable novel.
Novels were different than traditional nonfiction books. Where nonfiction works might be read and reread, consulted through the years as a valuable reference, this was not so with the novel. The novel was in fact a “consumable” good. Typically one read a novel once and never again. It was exactly the sort of book that made little sense to purchase (as an individual) and a tremendous amount of sense to rent.
Library catalogues reflected the (largely female reading) public’s hunger for novels. The average circulating library’s catalogue typically listed around five thousand titles. About twenty percent of those were fiction. However, many libraries boasted multiple copies of those novels, sometimes as many as twenty five copies. So that twenty percent of titles probably made up a much larger percentage of the libraries actual holdings. Research on smaller libraries, those averaging less than four hundred and fifty titles, reveals collections of up to seventy five percent fiction titles. Some research suggests that fiction was checked out three to four times as much as nonfiction, implying that for some of these smaller libraries almost all of their stock and trade was in the renting of novels. (Erickson, 1990) No wonder Mr. Collins was very suspicious of a book that looked like it came from a circulating library.
Not only were libraries a place where one could rent books, they were also a place to see and be seen. Watch for the next installment for more on that aspect of the circulating library.
Find References HERE
Find the Regency Life Index HERE
Read more about Regency era Amusements HERE.
Read more about libraries HERE.
If you’d like to read more about Regency era history, you might like these:
I’m so pleased that libraries became popular and continue to this day. As a child we didn’t have the money to buy many books so I relied on birthday and Christmas gifts as well as books passed from a family friend (some of which I still have as they were favourites of mine and my children)
However my greatest joy was my weekly library visit. I had 2 tickets but I also used my two brothers’ tickets so I had 6 books a week – such joy. Over the years I think I must have read almost every novel in the library. I also got books from my school library 🙂
I worked in a large town and was able to join their library with tickets for 10 books at a time (bliss). I encouraged my children by reading to them from their being babies and they too love books and are now spreading the love to their own children.
I now mostly read Darcy and Elizabeth based JAFF which I can’t get enough of and thanks to kindle I can buy enough to keep me happy (especially as I do like to re read my favourites).
So yes I would say that libraries have played a big part in my life.
I have very fond memories of my childhood libraries too. Very special, impactful places indeed.
In Mansfield Park, Fanny’s father read a borrowed paper and Fanny introduced her sister Susan to the circulating library.
My mother was an avid reader. She and her sister were always the first two on the library waiting list for any new book being launched. My aunt would read it first because she could devour a book in a night or two before giving it to mother. The librarians enjoyed their enthusiasm and liked the short turn-around with them and always notified them of any upcoming release.
My first memories of the library was when it was located in a donated building. The estate had been a private residence and I remember falling in love when I walked into that glorious room. It had to be something like what Elizabeth saw when she entered the Darcy House Library. It had dark woods and spiral staircases on each side of the room that lead to the stacks on the second story complete with open balconies. OMG! I still have that burned in my memory. That had to be 60 years ago. It killed me when they remodeled and took out that mezzanine. I realize elevators were necessary but, I grieved the loss of those beautiful wooden spiral staircases. I loved that library.
Spiral staircases are amazing. I would mourn their loss too.
This is a fascinating read. I thought of becoming a librarian at one point in my career (when I graduated with a BA in literature and couldn’t figure out what to do with it). I’ve thought about applying to our local library to work now that I’m done with homeschooling, but I’m keeping plenty busy with teaching online courses and my essay grading business. 🙂
The novel does seem to be a consumable although I’m sure that novels were checked out for re-reading from time to time. As a devoted re-reader of novels, I find that I don’t do as well with a Kindle Unlimited subscription because I race through the novels far too quickly (to get my money’s worth) and then can’t go back to re-read them once my subscription is over. (I only take a subscription when I know I’ll have some downtime, such as over the Christmas holy days and summer breaks.) Otherwise, I stick to my own local library which is the social hub of our small town of devoted readers.
We have a new librarian in our town of 1500 souls, and she was astonished at how many adults took part in the summer reading program–many more than in the kids’ program, something she’d never seen in our county libraries. We had thirty people at the prize drawing; I myself put in 20 tickets (each ticket represents ten hours of reading from June 1 to August 31). It helps that the prizes are awesome; I won a Kindle Fire 7!! (Which I promptly gave to my daughter for her business since I have a Fire 8 but mostly read from my beloved 1st gen Paperwhite.) I’m always checking the daily e-book “sales” on Book Gorilla and Bookbub, then I check to see if our library has the books I want and place orders with a statewide consortium of public and university libraries to obtain the books for free. 🙂 When we have had six people living on less than 2/3 of the median middle-class income mentioned above, we tend to obtain reading materials for free when we can. 😉
Thanks for this fascinating look at the advent of the circulating library, Maria Grace!! I look forward to the next installment!!
Warmly,
Susanne 🙂
It is amazing how readers will find a way to get books in their hands, whether it was hundreds of years ago leading to the rise of the circulating library, or today with all of the options you mentioned!