Though Pride and Prejudice’s (1995, movie version) Mr. Bennet referred to dowries as “bribes to worthless young men to marry his daughters,” dowries were more commonly considered a means by which a responsible family compensated a husband for their daughter’s lifelong upkeep. How’s that for a romantic notion?

In Dancing with Dragons Margaret Dashwood, lacking a responsible family, has a dowry provided by a kindly estate dragon. But what exactly was a dowry and how did it work?

Dowries for Young Ladies

Dowries (or more commonly the interest earned off a dowry) were used to provide a woman’s lifetime spending money, establish her income if she became a widow, and eventually distributed to her children at the death of one or both parents.

Marriage settlements specified a total amount of money set aside for future daughters’ dowries. The more daughters a family had, the more ways the sum would have to be divided. The division of the money was usually not specified, so it did not have to be divided evenly amongst the daughters.

A father might add to the sum during his lifetime, but if not stipulated in the settlement, it was not required. So the five Bennet daughters had to divide their mother’s five thousand pound dowry among them, which would provide a yearly interest income of about £50 each, since Mr. Bennet never laid aside an additional sum to add to their dowries.

Interesting twist though, there was no guarantee that a woman’s family would have the cash on hand to pay a dowry upon a daughter’s marriage. Often, that sum was tied up in estate capital or investments. The family might have to take out a mortgage to pay the dowry, or a down payment on it, with the final portion due from the estate at the father’s death.

To replenish the loss of capital, the heir of the estate needed to marry a bride with her own fortune. For Mr. Darcy, of Pride and Prejudice, his sister, Georgiana’s, considerable fortune of £30,000 would come out of the Pemberley coffers on her marriage. By choosing a bride who could not replenish that, Darcy, was putting Pemberley’s financial future at risk.

Dower and Jointure

Until into the nineteenth century, without a jointure established in a premarital contract, English common law ensured the widow had a dower right to a life interest in one third of the freehold lands in her husband’s hands at the time of her marriage. If a jointure was settled on the bride by her future husband, she would have to surrender her dower rights (not her dowry, though) to receive the jointure. With formal repeal of dower in 1833, wives lost the absolute right to inherit. So, in the absence of jointure in the marriage articles, or explicit provisions in a husband’s will, the widow could be left without support at her husband’s death. Even if a man left his wife property upon his death, it might be marked with the stipulation that it would revert to his heir or another designate if she remarried.

Jointures monies were rarely on the same level as the dowry a woman brought to the marriage. They were usually tied to the amount that a woman brought into a marriage. Generally, it was an annuity, payable by the heir of the estate, equal to one tenth of a woman’s dowry. The annuity would be payable by the heir of a man’s estate until the woman’s death upon which time the principle would descend to her children.

The ratio of jointure to dowry was established by the expectation that the average wife would outlive her husband by about ten years. Thus, she would most likely receive back the amount she brought into the marriage over the duration of her widowhood.

The issues of jointure and inheritance created the initial problems for the widowed Mrs. Dashwood and her daughters in Sense and Sensibility (and later in Dancing with Dragons). Mrs. Dashwood was the second wife of Mr. Dashwood and not the mother of his heir (his son). The estate passed into his son’s hands at the senior Mr. Dashwood’s death.

Since the current Mrs. Dashwood was not the heir’s mother, he had no obligation to provide for her or her daughters–and did not deign to do so. Instead, the widow and her daughters were forced to live on the income supplied by the jointure, £500. (This implies that she brought £5000 into the marriage as her dowry.) While the amount was sufficient to maintain them, it is not enough for luxuries like a carriage which would generally require twice that income to support. The amount would not have provided significant dowries of her daughters either, hence a sympathetic dragon stepped in. Any guesses as to which dragon might have done such a thing?

Want to learn more? Try Courtship and Marriage in Jane Austen’s World, available in ebook and paperback.

Please support this author and purchase it direct from me! Just click the cover. Use C3NDE1MA to get a 15% discount in the Random Bits Bookstore.

References

A Lady of Distinction   –   Regency Etiquette, the Mirror of Graces (1811). R.L. Shep Publications (1997)

A Master-Key to the Rich Ladies Treasury or The Widower and Batchelor’s Directory by a Younger Brother, published in 1742.

Day, Malcom   –   Voices from the World of Jane Austen. David & Charles (2006)

Gener, S., and John Muckersy. M. Gener, Or, A Selection of Letters on Life and Manners. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Printed for Peter Hill …, A. Constable & and A. MacKay ;, 1812.

Jones, Hazel   –   Jane Austen & Marriage . Continuum Books (2009)

Lane, Maggie   –   Jane Austen’s World. Carlton Books (2005)

Laudermilk, Sharon & Hamlin, Teresa L.   –   The Regency Companion. Garland Publishing (1989)

Le Faye, Deirdre   –   Jane Austen: The World of Her Novels. Harry N. Abrams (2002)

Ray, Joan Klingel   –   Jane Austen for Dummies. Wiley Publishing, Inc. (2006)

Ross, Josephine   –   Jane Austen’s Guide to Good Manners. Bloomsbury USA (2006)

Selwyn, David   –   Jane Austen & Leisure. The Hambledon Press (1999)

Vickery, Amanda   –   The Gentleman’s Daughter. Yale University Press (1998)